This single bench disposed of three Income Tax Appeals by dismissing them, holding that a previously decided judgment rendered the framed question of law unnecessary.
All Income Tax Appeals are dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICITON
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.648 OF 2004
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.649 OF 2004
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.635 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income-tax .. Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Yerrowda Investment Ltd. .. Respondent.
Mr.Ashok Kotangale for the appellant.
Mr.R. Murlidhar with Mr.A.K. Jasani for the
respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 7TH AUGUST, 2007.
P.C. :
1. In view of the judgment of this Court in the
case of C.I.T. V/s. J.K. Investors (Bombay)
Limited reported in 248 I.T.R. 723, the question of
law as framed would not arise.
2. Hence, all the appeals are dismissed.
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
C.I.T. V/s. J.K. Investors (Bombay) LimitedReferred¶12
248 I.T.R. 723
The Commissioner of Income-tax
M/s.Yerrowda Investment Ltd.
F.I. Rebello
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court