The High Court of Bombay dismissed the civil application as infructuous on the submission that the application had become so with the passage of time, noting no appearance by the respondent.
Application and Review Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.931 OF 2003
IN
REVIEW PETITION (ST)NO.15964 OF 2002
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.9 OF 1989
along with
REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO.15964 OF 2002
------------------------------------:----------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders.
coram, appearances, Court’s orders :
or directions and Registrar’s :
orders. :
------------------------------------:-----------------------------------
Mr Vilas B Tapkir, for the applicant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J.
DATED : 29th October, 2007
P.C.:
Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
Mr.Tapkir, learned counsel for the
applicant, submits that with the passage of
time this application and the Review Petition
has become infructuous. They are dismissed
as infructuous.
(D.B.BHOSALE,J.)
Applicant
Respondent
D.B. Bhosale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court