Disposed
Eknath Namdeo Pabale v. Krishnarao Shankarrao Gayate and Ors.
Bombay HCCAS/1359/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SHEET NO.: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1359 of 2006
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.394 of 2005
------------------------------------:----------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders.
coram, appearances, Court’s orders :
or directions and Registrar’s :
orders. :
------------------------------------:-----------------------------------
Mr S.M.Sabrad, for the applicant.
Mr S.P.Thorat, for respondent nos 1 to
5, 7 to 10.
Smt.Gauri Jadhav, for respondent nos 8
and 9.
CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE,J.
DATED: 26.10.2007
P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel for the
parties.
The respondents have not filed reply
opposing the prayer made in the application.
Keeping that in view and considering the
reasons stated in the application it is
allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). The
applicant to carry out amendment within one
week from today.
The civil application is disposed of.
(D.B.Bhosale, J.)
The Applicant
The Respondents
Bhosal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court