Antonette Ronel Augustine v. Pune Contonment Board and Anr.
Bombay HCCAS/665/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶2
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.665 OF 2006
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.428 OF 2006
¶3
Smt.Antonette Ronel Augustine Almeida ....Appellant
V/s.
The Pune Contonment Board & Anr. ....Respondents
¶4
Mr.S.G. Deshmukh for the Appellant.
¶5
Mr.V.G. Mujumdar for Respondent No.1.
¶6
Mr.M.V. Limaye for Respondent No.2.
¶7
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.
DATED : 3RD SEPTEMBER, 2007.
¶8
P.C.:
¶9
1.In view of dismissal of the Second Appeal,
nothing further survives in this Civil Application,
the same is accordingly dismissed.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Smt. Antonette Ronel Augustine Almeida
- respondent
The Pune Contonment Board & Anr.
Coram
AI extract
S.J. VAZIFDAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court