The High Court of Bombay, in Civil Application No. 28 of 2007, held the delay condonable based on an affidavit. The absent petitioner's application was allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
Civil application allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
as-cao28-07
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Civil application no. 28 of 2007 in Review Petition No. of 2007 in
Contempt Petition No. 269 of 2006.
Smt. Vrindavati Tukaram Bhere vs.
... Applicant / petitioner
Smt. Asha Anand Dabholkar & ors. ... Respondents
Shri R. S. Kadam holding for U.P.Warunjikar for respondent nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM: D. G. KARNIK J.
DATE: 16th March 2007
P.C.:
Heard learned counsel for the respondent. Petitioner is absent when called. Perused the affidavit in support of the application. For the reasons stated therein the delay is condoned and the civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
Smt. Vrindavati Tukaram Bhere
Smt. Asha Anand Dabholkar & ors.
D. G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
