The High Court of Bombay dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's failure to adduce evidence and produce witnesses after being given two opportunities to do so. The dismissal was made under Order 9 Rule 8 and Order 17 Rule 2 CPC.
Suit dismissed under Order 9 Rule 8 read with Order 17 Rule 2 CPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
s688-82-2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 688 OF 1982
PARKE DAVUS (INDIA) LTD. .... Plaintiff V/S THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF BOMBAY ... Defendant
Mr. Vishal Shah i/b. CRAWFORD BAYLEY AND CO. for plaintiff Mr. U. J. Makhija i/b. MULLA AND MULLA AND CRAIGIE BLUNT AND CAROE for defendant
CORAM: D.G. KARNIK J .
DATE: March , 12, 2007
P.C.:
(D.G. KARNIK J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit should be dismissed for failure of plaintiff to adduce evidence upon second chance.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
D.G. Karnik J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
