The High Court of Judicature at Bombay granted two applications for condonation of delay of 89 days in filing review petitions under the Civil Appeals Nos. 127/2007 and 128/2007.
Condonation of delay of 89 days; review petitions placed for admission on 5th September 2007.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FARADCONTINUNATION SHEET
C.A.NO.127/2007 IN R.P.ST.NO.20165/2006 IN S.A.NO.899/2005
AND
C.A.NO.128/2007 IN R.P.ST.NO.20160/2006 IN S.A.NO.869/2005
.............................................................
Office Notes,Office
memorandum of Coram,
appearances,Court’sCourt’s or
orders or directionsJudge’s orders
& Registrar’s orders.
Mr.A.P.Rege for the Applicant
Mr.P.Chavan for Respondent Nos.2 to 4.
CORAM: A.S.OKA, J.
DATE : AUGUST 17,2007.
P.C.:
1. The learned Advocate for the Applicant
states that the first Respondent is duly
served and he will file Affidavit of
service. The second to fourth respondents
are represented by an Advocate.
2. The applications for condonation of
delay is opposed by the learned counsel
for the second to fourth respondents by
pointing out that there is no sufficient
cause. Considering the facts and
circumstances of the case, delay of 89
days deserves to be condoned.
Accordingly, applications are allowed in
terms of prayer clauses (a). Place the
Review Petitions for admission on 5th
September 2007.
-2-
JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 89 days in filing review petitions deserves to be condoned?
Applicant
1st Respondent
2nd Respondent
3rd Respondent
4th Respondent
A.S.Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court