The High Court of Bombay, in a civil application regarding a family court appeal, granted an extension of time for condonation of delay and directed the appellant to remove office objections by the next date.
Delay condoned; appellant directed to remove office objections by next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 154 OF 2007
IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL ST. NO. 36883 OF 1999
Raosaheb Gopinath Shitole. .. Applicant.
vs.
Hirabai Raosaheb Shitole. .. Respondent.
Ms. Kavita Pawar h/f Sanjay Kshirsagar for Applicant.
Mr. Samir Suryawanshi h/f Avinash Avhad
for respondent.
CORAM: J.N. PATEL &
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE: 14TH AUGUST 2007.
P.C.
. Heard.
2. For the reasons stated in the application,
delay is condoned. In case the Appeal is not
registered and numbered by the registry for want of
condonation of delay, the same may be registered,
numbered and placed for admission after two weeks.
2
3. The appellant to remove all office objections
on or before the next date.
(J.N. Patel, J. )
(A.A. Sayed, J. )
Raosaheb Gopinath Shitole
Hirabai Raosaheb Shitole
J.N. PATEL
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court