This order in Civil Appellate Jurisdiction condoned delay in filing the Letters Patent Appeal. The opposed application was disposed of without engaging with substantive merits or cited precedents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.217 OF 2007 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST.) NO.13072 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7043 OF 2006 Narayan Bhaskar Pagdhare and others ..Applicants. Vs.
..Applicants.
Bajaj Auto Ltd. and others
..Respondents.
Ms. Gayatri Singh for the Applicants. Mr. J.P. Cama, Senior Advocate for the Respondents.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 19th October, 2007.
P.C. :
The Civil Application is not opposed. The delay in filing the LPA is condoned. The Civil Application is disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Narayan Bhaskar Pagdhare and others
Bajaj Auto Ltd. and others
Swatanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
