Disposed
Dr. Manohar Harjeevan Seth v. Dr. Uday Govardhan Seth and Anr.
Bombay HCCAF/1255/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
INININ THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[-1-]
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 1255 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL (St.)No. 377 OF 2006 --------------------------------------------Office notes, : office memoranda : of coram, : appearances, : Court’s orders : Court’s or Judge’s directions & : order Registrar’s : orders : ---------------------------------------------Mr. Satish Pathak, advocate for applicant.
CORAM: J. N. PATEL, AND A. A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 6, 2007.
P.C.:
. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, delay is condoned.
listed on board for admission after
2 weeks.
Sd/Sd/- [ A. A. SAYED, J.] [ J. N. PATEL, J.]
Mr. Satish Pathak's client
J. N. PATEL
A. A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court