Dismissed

Sanjay Motisingh Pardeshi and Ors. v. Yeola Municipal Council and Ors.

Bombay HC12 Jul 2007CAI/39/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court disposed of two civil applications for impleadment in a public interest litigation regarding unauthorized structures. The court allowed the applications without opposition and directed corrections in prior court minutes regarding party nomenclature.

What did the court decide?

Both civil applications for impleadment were allowed and disposed of.

Sanjay Motisingh Pardeshi and Ors. Vs Yeola… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Bombay HC (2007)

¶1

 -: 1 :-

¶2

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2007

¶5

IN

¶6

 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 46 OF 2007

¶7

 Sanjay Motisingh Pardeshi & Ors.... Applicants.
 A N D
 Deepak Chandrakant Patodkar.. ... Petitioner.
 Versus

¶8

 Yeola Municipal Council & Ors....... Respondents.

¶9

 -: ALONG WITH :-

¶10

 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 40 OF 2007
 IN

¶11

 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 46 OF 20074

¶12

 Sachin S Patil & Ors... .... Applicants.
 A N D
 Deepak Chandrakant Patodkar.. ... Petitioner.
 Versus
 Yeola Municipal Council & Ors....... Respondents.

¶13

 Mr.Chetan Agarwal for Applicants in C.A.39/07
 Mr.Ajay S. Patil for Applicants in C.A.40/07
 Mr. S.C.Naidu for the Petitioner.
 Mr.S.S.Kulkarni for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
 Mr. Surel Shah for Respondent No.3.
 Mr. P.M.Patil, AGP for the State.
 Mr.S.S.Pakale for Respondent No.1.
 Mr. P.M.Patil, AGP for the State.

¶14

CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. &
SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.

¶15

DATED : 12TH JULY, 2007.

¶16

P.C.:

¶17

 Learned Counsel appearing for the parties concede

¶18

 -: 2 :-

¶19

 before us that the present petition would relate to
 C.T.S.No.3807.

¶20

 2. Both the civil applications for impleadment of the
 applicants as party to the present petition are
 allowed as there is no opposition. Applicants are
 permitted to be added.

¶21

 3. Both the civil applications are disposed of,

¶22

 accordingly.

¶23

 4. Minutes of the Court Order dated 5th July, 2007

¶24

 are corrected to the extent that according to
 respondent no.1 there are 56 unauthorised structures
 on C.T.S. No. 3807. In para 1 the word "builders"

¶25

 shall be construed and read as "Municipal Council".

¶26

 5. S. O. to 26th July, 2007.

¶27

 Sd/-

¶28

CHIEF JUSTICE

¶29

 Sd/-

¶30

SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.

Sanjay Motisingh Pardeshi and Ors. v. Yeola Municipal Council and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Motisingh Pardeshi and Ors. v. Yeola Municipal Council and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Pundlik Hargode Vs the Administrator, Cidco and Ors.

R.C.Kotiankar and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Mumbai Pune Taxi Tourist Service Centre Vs the Pune Taximens Consumer Co-Operative Society Ltd. and Ors.

Small Scale Enterpreneurs Association and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Babasaheb Ramrao Patil and Ors. Vs the State Election Commission, Mumbai and Ors.

Nepean Sea Road Citizens Forum and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary Urban Development Department and Ors.