This application sought to recall an order dismissing a PIL for setting up a Family Court at Thane due to inaction. The Single Judge recalled the dismissal order, restored the PIL, and listed it for admission.
The order dated 17th August 2005 was recalled; PIL No. 130 of 2004 was restored and listed for admission on 7th March 2007.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 32 OF 2006
IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 130 OF 2007
Manubhai P. Vashi
..Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others
...Respondents
Mr. Manish Mistry, instructed by M/s. M.P. Vashi & Associates for the petitioner.
Mr. V.P. Malwankar, Assistant Government Pleader, for the State.
CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE, Ag. C.J., & V.M. KANADE, J.
DATE: FEBRUARY 22, 2007 .
P.C.
Heard Mr. Mistry in support of this application.
-2-
while disposing of the PIL on 17th August, 2005. Mr. Malwankar has appeared for the respondents. He leaves it to the Court to pass appropriate orders. Accordingly, we allow the Civil Application. The order passed on 17th August, 2005 is recalled. PIL No. 130 of 2004 is restored to its original number. PIL No. 130 of 2004 be now listed for admission and orders on 7th March, 2007.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
V.M. KANADE, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Application seeking recall of an order dismissing the PIL regarding the setting up of a Family Court at Thane is maintainable.
Manubhai P. Vashi
State of Maharashtra
H.L. Gokhale
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
