Disposed

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. 1. Kedu Bhaguji Jadhav and Ors.

Bombay HC9 Oct 2007CAF/681/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay disposed of Civil Application No. 681 of 2007/First Appeal No. 2336 of 2007. The application was allowed regarding prayer clause (a) as the applicant had deposited the decretal amount pursuant to an earlier order. Respondents were given liberty to apply for withdrawal subject to notice.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed in terms of prayer clause (a); liberty to respondents to apply for withdrawal subject to notice.

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs 1. Kedu… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2007)

¶1

ssm

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 681 OF 2007

¶5

IN

¶6

FIRST APPEAL NO. 2336 OF2007

¶7

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Office Notes, Office Memoranda
 of Coram, appearances, Court’s
 Orders or directions and
 Registrar’s OrdersCourt’s or Judge’s Orders

¶8

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

¶9

Ms. Anisha Narayanan i/by Mr.
S.M.Vidyarthi for the applicants.
Mr. Sachin Kadam for responent
No.1.

¶10

CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.
DATED : 9th October, 2007.

¶11

P.C.

¶12

1. Considering the averments
made and in view of the order

¶13

dated 2nd February, 2007, which
has been in force since then, the
present application is allowed in
terms of prayer clause (a).
Pursuance to the order dated 2nd
February, 2007, the applicant has
already deposited the decretal
amount.

¶14

( 2 )

¶15

2. The respondents-original
claimants are at liberty to apply
for the withdrawal of the same
subject to notice to other side.

¶16

3. The Civil application is
disposed of, accordingly.

¶17

[ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. 1. Kedu Bhaguji Jadhav and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. 1. Kedu Bhaguji Jadhav and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ronald Clive Victor Vs Fahim Y. Rais and Ors.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr. Vs Anant Ziparya Bhagat and Ors.

The New India Assurance Co.Ltd. Vs Chandrabhaga Baban Taware and Ors.

Shripati Anandrao Marane Vs 1. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

The State of Maharashtra Vs Smt. Paribai Rama Bhusare and Anr.

The State of Maharashtra Vs Shri Mahadu Dagadu Bhusare