Disposed
The State of Maharashtra v. Smt. Paribai Rama Bhusare and Anr.
Bombay HCCA/2639/1999
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
INININ THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2639 of 1999
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 2253 OF 2007
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Office Notes, Office Memoranda
of Coram, appearances, Court’s
Orders or directions and
Registrar’s OrdersCourt’s or Judge’s Orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ms. P.H.Kantharia for the State.
Ms. Smita Gaidhane for the
respondents.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.
DATED : 9th October, 2007.
P.C.
1. Considering the averments made, the
effect and operation of the judgment is
stayed subject to depositing the total
decretal amount within 12 weeks.
2. The respondents- original claimants,
if any, are entitled to apply for the
withdrawal of the same.
3. The Civil Application is disposed
of, accordingly.
[ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the stay on the effect and operation of the judgment remains valid subject to depositing the decretal amount.
Whether the respondents-original claimants are entitled to apply for withdrawal of the stay.
State
ANOOV V. MOHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court