Rejected interim relief application as no prayer was made after the underlying suit was dismissed with no interim grant towards pendency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.339 OF 2006 IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.2128 OF 2006
.............................................................
Office Notes,Office
memorandum of Coram,
appearances,Court’sCourt’s or
orders or directionsJudge’s orders
& Registrar’s orders.
.............................................................
Mr.P.G.Lad for the Applicant
Mr.A.K.Tripathi with Mr.P.V.Dhopatkar for
the Respondents.
CORAM: A.S.OKA, J.
DATE : JANUARY 9,2007.
P.C.:
1. Heard Advocates for the parties. The
suit filed by the Applicant has been
dismissed on 19th July 2005. During the
pendency of the suit there was no interim
relief granted in favour of the Applicant.
After dismissal of the suit there is no
ad-interim relief granted by this Court.
Hence, no case is made out for grant of
interim relief. Application is rejected.
JUDGE
Applicant
Respondents
A.S.Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court