Disposed
Bhagawatiprasad Ramdev Mishra v. Deviprasad Ramdev Mishra and Anr.
Bombay HCCAF/2988/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2988 OF 2006
IN
FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 14235 OF 2006
.......................................................... Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr. Y. S. Bhate for the Applicant. None for the Respondents.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 01ST OCTOBER, 2007
P.C. :
. This is an application for
| condonation | of |
delay | in filing |
the |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | Appeal. | As | per | the |
| Applicant, | there | are | only 12 |
days |
| delay | in fili |
ng th |
e First |
Appeal. |
| However, | Office | has | count | the |
| delay | of 56 |
days. | None | appears |
for Respondent though time and
opportunity was given.
:2:
is
made out, the Application
allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
(ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 56 days in filing the First Appeal warrants condonation under the applicable rules.
Office Notes
Anoop V. Mota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court