Single-judge order disposing of a civil application to continue an interim order pending the admission of a first appeal; respondent was absent.
Interim order granted continued pending admission of the First Appeal; Civil Application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2431 OF 2007
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1853 OF 2007
.......................................................... Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr. Sandeep Bhagwat for the Applicant. None for the Respondent.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
DATE : 01ST OCTOBER, 2007
P.C. :
| . No |
ne | presen | t for |
the |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Respondent | though | served. | The | |
| interim or |
der | has | been in |
force |
| since 26th |
April | 2007. | None | |
| appeared | for | the | Respondent | again |
| though matter is | listed und | er | ||
| caption "For Interi | m Order". |
| 2. Considering the |
averments | |
|---|---|---|
| made in the |
Civil | Application |
| therefore, the |
interim | order |
| granted shall continue pending the | ||
| admission of the First Appeal. |
:2:
disposed of accordingly.
(ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.)
Applicant
Respondent
ANOOP V. MOHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
