C. Nagraj and Anr. v. Hiranand L. Jethani
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellate court dismissed the civil appeal because the required amount was not deposited by the applicant despite an extension of time granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APLICATION NO. 2962 OF 2007
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.1864 OF 2007
C. Nagraj and anr...Applicants
V/s
Hiranand L. Jethani..Respondent.
Mr. S.R. Nargolkar for the applicants.
Mr.A.B. Tejane for the respondent
CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 11TH SEPTEMBER, 2007
P.C.
1.Inspite of extension of time, the amount has
not been depoisited by the applicant. The
application therefore, does not survive and stands
dismissed.
C. Nagraj
Hiranand L. Jethani
J.N. Patel
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court