Disposed
Hiralal Nathulal Shah v. Rajdeo Tiwari
Bombay HCCAF/296/2004
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
... 1 ...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.296 OF 2004
IN
FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.3043 OF 2004
...........................................................
OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE
MEMORANDUM OF CORAM,
APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES
ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS
AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS
...........................................................
Ms H.M. Chawate for the Applicant.
CORAM : A. S. OKA, J.
DATE : JANUARY 10, 2007.
P.C.:
1. If Bhatta is not paid within period
of four weeks from today, the Application
will stand dismissed for want of
prosecution. If Bhatta is paid within four
weeks from today, office will issue notice
to the Respondent returnable on 23rd
February, 2007. In addition to service of
notice through court, Advocate for the
Applicant to serve private notice and file
affidavit of service before the returnable
date. If affidavit of service is not filed
before the returnable date, Application will
stand dismissed for want of prosecution.
... 2 ...
JUDGE
A. S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court