Civil application allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b); office directed to issue fresh notice to respondent No.2.
Office to issue fresh notice to respondent No.2 at present correct address, returnable within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2621 OF 2003
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 589 OF1995
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Office Notes, Office Memoranda
of Coram, appearances, Court’s
Orders or directions and
Registrar’s OrdersCourt’s or Judge’s Orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ms. Usha Kajeria, APP for the
State.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.
DATED : 3rd September, 2007.
P.C.
1. Considering the averments
made, the Civil application is
allowed in terms of prayer clause
(a) and (b). Office to issue
fresh notice, to respondent No.2
as per the present correct
address, returnable within six
weeks.
[ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]
State
Anoop V. Mota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court