Disposed
Lalji Agarwal v. Namiben Ladka Bawisha and Ors.
Bombay HCCAF/1050/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
INININ THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1050 OF 2006
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1616 OF2006
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Office Notes, Office Memoranda
of Coram, appearances, Court’s
Orders or directions and
Registrar’s OrdersCourt’s or Judge’s Orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mr. Rakesh Pandey for the
applicant.
Mr. Rahul Walwekar for the
respondents.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.
DATED : 3rd September, 2007.
P.C.
1. In view of the dismissal of
the First appeal, this
application also stand disposed
of. However, the parties are at
liberty to take appropriate
proceedings.
Applicant
Respondents
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court