A short order condoning a 21-day delay in filing a criminal application. Heard in the absence of respondent counsel; delay accepted and application allowed.
Condonation of delay of 21 days; application allowed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 64 OF 2007
IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 313 OF 2007
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2007
The State of Maharashtra ..Appellants
versus
Ramesh D. Yevale & Anr. ..Respondents
Mr. P.A. Pol, APP for the Appellants - State.
CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, &
SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ.
DATE : 6TH JUNE, 2007.
P.C.
1. Heard.
2. This is an application for condonation of
delay of 21 days. As per the affidavit of service
filed by the State, the Respondents are served.
Nobody is present for them. No reply is filed.
Delay is satisfactorily explained. Delay is
condoned. Application is allowed and disposed of
accordingly.
3. Put up the matter on 12.6.2007.
:2:
(SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (D.G. DESHPANDE, J.)
The State of Maharashtra
Ramesh D. Yevale & Anr.
D. G. Deshpande
Nishita Mhatre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court