This is a brief order from the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. Leave to appeal was granted and the appeal was admitted following action taken by the trial court under Section 390 of the Cr.P.C.
Leave granted and appeal admitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 795 OF 2007
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2007
The State of Maharashtra ..Appellants
versus
Naresh K. Lukkad & 2 Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. P.A. Pol APP for the Appellants - State.
CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, &
SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ.
DATE : 6TH JUNE, 2007.
P.C.
1. Heard learned APP for the Appellants -
State.
2. Leave granted. Appeal admitted.
3. Action under Section 390 of the Cr.P.C.
before the trial court.
(SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (D.G. DESHPANDE, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal arising from action under Section 390 of the Cr.P.C. should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State of Maharashtra
Naresh K. Lukkad
2 Ors.
D. G. Deshpande
Nishita Mhatre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court