The court granted leave to appeal against accused no.1 admitted the appeal and directed the trial court to take action under Section 390 Cr.P.C.
Leave to appeal granted against accused no.1; appeal admitted; action under Section 390 Cr.P.C. directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5045 OF 2005
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2005
------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s
Memoranda of Coram, orders
appearance, Court’s
orders or directions
and Registrar’s orders
------------------------------------------------------
Mr. A.S. Shitole, APP for
applicant-State.
CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE,J.
27/08/2007.
P.C.:
. Heard Mr. Shitole, the learned
APP for the applicant-State.
. Leave to appeal is hereby granted
but only against accused no.1.
. Appeal is admitted accordingly.
. Action under Section 390 of
Cr.P.C. to be taken by the trial
court.
(B.H. Marlapalle,J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State of Maharashtra
Accused No.1
B.H. MARLAPALLE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court