The High Court returned an impounded passport to the applicant, directing the State to do so as investigation had been pending for nearly 10 months without reply to a prior order for completion.
Directed the Respondent to return the passport to the Applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
/ 1 /
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4205 OF 2006
Shri Atul Prabhakar Dande
...Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra
...Respondent
Mr.Nitin Deshpande for Applicant. Mrs.M.M. Deshmukh, APP for the State.
CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : 9th OCTOBER, 2007. P.C:-
State.
10 months have passed after the said order. No affidavit in reply has been filed so far.
/ 2 /
have been completed by this time. Hence, there is no reason why passport should remain impounded. The Respondent is directed to return the passport to the Applicant. In the event of chargehsheet being already filed by the prosecution, then Applicant shall obtain permission of the Trial Court if he intends to travel abroad.
. Application is disposed of accordingly.
V.M. KANADE, J.
Shri Atul Prabhakar Dande
The State of Maharashtra
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
