The High Court of Bombay, in a criminal appeal through jail against a life conviction, condoned a 30-day delay and disposed of the application by admitting the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bsb
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 804 OF 2006
Ajaykumar Bali Yadav... Appellant
V/s
The State of Maharashtra... Respondent
Mr. A.G. Toraskar, advocate appointed for the appellant.
Mr. A.S. Shitole, A.P.P. for the State.
CORAM: D. G. DESHPANDE &
SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ.
DATED: 7TH JUNE, 2007.
P.C.:
1. Heard the advocate for the accused. This is an
appeal through jail. There is delay of 30 days’. The
accused is convicted for life. Therefore, delay is
condoned.
2. Appeal admitted. Paper book is ready.
3. Application disposed of.
2
(SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.)
Ajaykumar Bali Yadav
The State of Maharashtra
D. G. Deshpande
Nishita Mhatre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court