The single judge dismissed the bail application noting no new grounds were presented after prior rejections, directed preparation of the paper book, and disposed of the application without granting bail.
No bail granted; paper-book directed to be prepared within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bsb
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 700 OF 2006
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 488 OF 2005
Mohamed Hussain Mohamed
Siddique Hamidani... Applicant
V/s
The State of Maharashtra... Respondent
Mr. B.R. Patil for the applicant.
Dr. F.R. Shaikh, A.P.P. for the respondent State.
CORAM: D. G. DESHPANDE &
SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ.
DATED: 16TH MARCH, 2007.
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. B.R. Patil for the accused/applicant.
Two bail applications of the accused were already
rejected. No new ground nor any subsequent development
is there. Therefore, we cannot entertain this
application. However, we direct the office to prepare
the paper-book at the earliest within a period of six
months from today. Thereafter the fixed date of hearing
shall be given. Criminal application disposed of.
2
(SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.)(D.G. DESHPANDE, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court can entertain the bail application when no new ground is raised after previous rejections.
Mohamed Hussain
State of Maharashtra
D. G. DESHPANDE
NISHITA MHATRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court