Suit adjourned again due to non-appearance of plaintiffs' counsel; dismissed for want of prosecution.
The suit has been dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AJN
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.3769 OF 1996
M/s. Creative Unit Private Limited ... Plaintiffs
Vs.
M/s. Angad Home Appliances Pvt. Ltd.
... Defendants
None for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Denzil D'Mello for the defendants.
CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.
DATED : AUGUST 24, 2007.
P.C.:-
On 23/8/2007, the learned counsel for the plaintiffs was not
present. Hence, the suit was adjourned to 24/8/2007. Today again
the learned counsel for the plaintiffs is not present. Hence, the suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
[SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.]
Ranjana Desai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
