Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition regarding land revenue code allotment representation; petition was allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO.8612 OF 2005
Subhash C. Botre .... Petitioner
Vs.
Secretary to the Government,
Revenue & Forest Department
& Ors. .... Respondents
Shri N.V. Vechalekar for the Petitioner.
Shri C.R. Sonawane, AGP, for the Respondents.
CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR &
NARESH H. PATIL, JJ.
DATED: AUGUST 21, 2006
P.C:
The learned Advocate for the petitioner states
that in order to enable the petitioner to make a proper
representation for allotment of plot under the
Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, the petitioner
craves leave to withdraw the present petition. The
petition is allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed
of accordingly.
(Naresh H. Patil, J.) (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.)
sjs/821wp8612.05
Subhash C. Botre
Secretary to the Government, Revenue & Forest Department
R.M.S. Khandeparkar
Naresh H. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court