The high court of Bombay allowed withdrawal of writ petition no. 2725 of 2004 by the petitioners and disposed of the matter accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the petition was allowed and the matter was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
WRIT PETITION NO.2725 OF 2004.
Ashok Babanrao Daundakar
and others. : Petitioners.
versus
The State of Maharashtra
and others. : Respondents.
Shri H.P.Vyas, Advocate, for the Petitioners.
CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR &
NARESH H. PATIL, JJ.
DATED : 19th AUGUST 2006.
P.C.
1. Learned Advocate for the petitioners
states that the petition has been rendered
infructuous and, therefore, he seeks permission
to withdraw the petition. Petition is allowed to
be withdrawn and stand disposed of accordingly.
[R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J]
[NARESH H. PATIL, J]
Ashok Babanrao Daundakar
The State of Maharashtra
R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
NARESH H. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court