This order grants leave to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition as it has become infructuous. The rule is discharged accordingly.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.[1].
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.73 OF 1995
Rajnarayan Jagatnarayan
Trigunayat ...Petitioner.
Versus
State of Maharashtra
and 3 Ors. ...Respondents.
....
Mr.D.J.Halwai i/b. M.M.Vashi, Advocate for the
Petitioner.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATED : NOVEMBER 13, 2006.
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave
to withdraw the petition as it has become
infructuous. Hence, Rule stands discharged.
[DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.]
.[2].
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Rajnarayan Jagatnarayan Trigunayat
State of Maharashtra
S.Radhakrishnan
V.K.Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court