The Writ Petition was disposed of via Rule (Rule), due to death of the Petitioner (abatement).
Writ petition abated; Rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1951 OF 1998
Shri.Gajanan S.Jathar ..Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra
& Ors. ..Respondents
Mr.N.M.Ganguli Advocate for Petitioner
Mr.Rahul L.Nerlekar Advocate for Respondent
Mrs.Madhubala Kajale AGP for State
CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : NOVEMBER 9,2006
P.C.
1. The learned counsel for the Petitioner says
that the Petitioner has died. Petition stands
abated. Hence, Rule discharged.
[DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Gajanan S. Jathar
State of Maharashtra
D.Radhakrishnan
V.K.Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court