Dr.Hemantkumar G.Borse v. Directory of Medical Research Education and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/533/1999
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner sought to place petition before the Court. Since it became infructuous, the writ petition was discharged without substantive adjudication.
What did the court decide?
Rule stands discharged.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
- 1 -
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
¶3
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶4
WRIT PETITION NO.533 OF 1999
¶5
Dr.Hemantkumar Gopal Borse ..Petitioner
¶6
Vs.
¶7
Director of Medical Research
Education and Research
& Ors. ..Respondents
¶8
...
Mr.S.A.Ghaisas i/b Mr.D.K.Ghaisas for Petitioner
None for Respondents
¶9
CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : NOVEMBER 14, 2006
¶10
P.C.
¶11
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
¶12
None appears for respondents. As the present
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Dr. Hemantkumar Gopal Borse
- respondent
Director of Medical Research Education and Research
Coram
AI extract
Dr. S. Radhakrishnan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court