The petitioners sought leave to withdraw a writ petition. The court allowed the withdrawal, noting the petition had become infructuous, and discharged the rule.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.262 OF 1998
M/s.Hotel & Restaurant Association (Western India) & Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. Airport Authority of Inida & Ors. ..Respondents
Ms.Jyotsana Kondhalkar for the Petitioners. None for the Respondents.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : 15TH NOVEMBER, 2006
P.C.
he seeks leave to withdraw the Petition. Hence, Rule
stands discharged.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
M/s.Hotel & Restaurant Association (Western India) & Ors.
Airport Authority of Inida & Ors.
DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
