Dismissed

Prabodh Narottamdas Shah v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC18 Apr 2006WP/461/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn; petition advocate requested withdrawal to pursue civil relief. Court held injunction does not bind UCO Bank; respondent requested 30-day auction stay, accepted without granting benefit to petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn. 30-day stay on auction accepted for respondent; no order in favour of petitioner.

Prabodh Narottamdas Shah Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2006)

¶1

:1:

¶2

 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.461 OF 2006

¶4

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders.
 of Coram, appearance, Court’s
 orders or directions and
 Registrar’s orders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Mr. R.P.Lambey i/by D.B. Tara for the
 Petitioner.
 Mr.Rajesh More,APP. for the State.
CORAM : R.S.MOHITE,J.
DATED :18/4/2006.
 P.C.
 1. Heard Advocate for the petitioner.
 In my view, the injunction order as
 granted by this court does not bind the
 UCO Bank. The Advocate for the
 petitioner states that he would like to
 withdraw this petition and make an
 attempt to obtain further order in the
 civil proceedings. In the
 circumstances, petition is dismissed as
 withdrawn. The Advocate for the
 Respondent No.11 states that auction
 will not be held for a period of 30
 days from today. Statement is

¶5

:2:

¶6

 accepted. It is made clear that I am
 not passing any order in favour of the
 petitioner and mere acceptance of the
 statement made by the Respondent No.11
 will not be in any way confer any
 benefit or advantage to the petitioner.

¶7

(R. S. MOHITE, J.)

Prabodh Narottamdas Shah v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabodh Narottamdas Shah v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baban Nandiwadekar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Amani Gopal Pujari Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sampat Dattajirao Pawar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Mohammed Yasin @ Abu Mohd. Nasir Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Dattatraya Us Todani and Wahatuk Sahakari Sanstha Vs Haribhau Babasaheb Nimbalkar and Anr.

Achala Vijay Shrivastav Vs Vijay Rajendra Shrivastav and Ors.