The petitioner is allowed to withdraw the writ petition, which is dismissed with no order as to costs. No substantive legal proposition is laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITON NO.3022 OF 2005
M/s.Jeena & Co. Pvt. Ltd. ..Petitioner.
V/s.
Asstt. Commissioner of Income
Tax & Ors. ..Respondents.
Mr.P.K.Parida for petitioner.
Mr.Shiv Motariya for respondents.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 5TH JUNE, 2006.
P.C. :-
On the motion made by the learned counsel
for the petitioner, he is allowed to withdraw the
petition. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with no
order as to costs.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
M/s.Jeena & Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax
V.C. DAGA
J.P.DEVADHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court