The High Court of Bombay allowed the withdrawal of a writ petition, with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings, and discharged the rule with no order as to costs.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn; rule discharged with liberty to file appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITON NO.200 OF 1991
All India Photographic Dealers
Association & Ors. ..Petitioners.
V/s.
Shri O.P.Gahrotra & Ors. ..Respondents.
Mr.P.C.Joshi for petitioners.
Mr.Niranjan Pandit, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 & 2.
CORAM : Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 3RD MARCH, 2006.
P.C. :-
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners
and the respondent Nos. 1 & 2. The learned counsel for
the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this petition
with liberty to file appropriate proceedings if
required. Accordingly, petition is allowed to be
withdrawn and rule stands discharged with no order as to
costs with the aforesaid liberty.
(Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J. P. DEVADHAR, J.)
All India Photographic Dealers Association & Ors.
Shri O.P. Gahrotra & Ors.
Dr. S. Radhakrishnan
J. P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court