A criminal writ petition challenging a detention order was dismissed as infructuous because the one-year detention period expired on the date of hearing.
Rule discharged; Petition dismissed as infructuous due to expiry of detention period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
Criminal Writ Petition No.2994 of 2005
Shri Manohar Budhaji Patil Petitioner Vs. D.Shivanandan, The Commissioner of Police, Thane & ors. Respondents
Respondents
Mr.Amol P. Mhatre for petitioner. Mr.D.S.Mhaispurkar, APP for State.
CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & NARESH H.PATIL,JJ.
October 04, 2006.
P.C.
. The impugned order of detention was passed on
3/10/2005 and it was implemented on the very same day. The detention period of one year thus got over
on 2/10/2006 and, therefore, as of now the challenge
in the petition has become infructuous.
. The petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Rule is discharged.
(NARESH H. PATIL,J.)
(B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)
Shri Manohar Budhaji Patil
D. Shivanandan
The Commissioner of Police, Thane
Naresh H. Patil
B. H. Marlapalle
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
