Detention detention order expired; petition disposed no order. The detention order expired, making the challenge infructuous peti
Rule discharged; petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
Criminal Writ Petition No.245 of 2006
Shri Sikandar Mehmood Sayyed @ Sayyed Shakir Mohd.Badshah @ Sikku @ Shakir @ Mapala @ Takala Sikander
Petitioner
Vs.
Shri A.N.Roy & ors. Respondents Mr.U.N.Tripathi for petitioner. Mr.D.S.Mhaispurkar, APP for State.
CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & NARESH H.PATIL,JJ.
October 04, 2006.
P.C.
. The impugned order of detention was passed on 26/08/2005 and it was implemented on the very same day. The detention period of one year thus got over
on 25/08/2006 and, therefore, as of now the challenge
in the petition has become infructuous.
. The petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Rule is discharged.
(NARESH H. PATIL,J.)
(B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)
Shri Sikandar Mehmood Sayyed
Shri A.N.Roy
NARESH H.PATIL
B.H.MARLAPALLE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
