Disposed

Farooque Ishaq Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC15 Feb 2006WP/292/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court held that it cannot interfere in a show cause notice under Section 111 Cr.P.C. regarding proceedings under Section 107 Cr.P.C. The petition was disposed of with directions curbing execution of interim or final bond orders for one week.

What did the court decide?

Direction that orders under Section 116(3) or Section 117 Cr.P.C. shall not be executed for one week.

Farooque Ishaq Shaikh Vs the State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2006)

¶1

:1:

¶2

 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

 CRI. WRIT PETITION NO.292 OF 2006
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders.
 of Coram, appearance, Court’s
 orders or directions and
 Registrar’s orders.

¶4

 Mr. B.M.Shaikh for the Petitioner.
 Mrs. M.M.Mhatre,APP. for the State.

¶5

CORAM : R.S. MOHITE,J.
DATED : 15/2/2006.

¶6

 P.C.
 1. This petition challenges a show
 cause notice under Section 111 in
 respect of a proceeding under Section
 107 of the Cr.P.C. It is not possible
 to interfere in the show cause notice.
 The appropriate course would be to show
 cause. Petition is disposed of with
 the directions that in case any order
 is passed under Section 116(3) or under
 Section 117 asking for interim or final
 bond, the same order will not be
 executed for a period of one week to
 enable the petitioner to challenge the
 said order if he so desires.

¶7

(R. S. MOHITE,J.

Farooque Ishaq Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Farooque Ishaq Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra G. Mahale Vs the State of Maharashtra

Vikas Namdev Sathe Vs the State of Maharashtra

Nandlal Kumbandas Tontai and Anr. . Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Vijay Madhukar Thorat Vs the State of Maharashtra

V.K. Gupta Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Surajkumar Patwa Vs the State of Maharashtra