Allowed
Vijay Madhukar Thorat v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPPLN/504/2006
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In this application challenging an order rejecting the recall of an Investigating Officer for further cross-examination, the court held that in the interest of justice, the officer should be allowed to be cross-examined by the accused's counsel to avoid a lacuna in the trial. The order rejecting the recall was set aside.
What did the court decide?
The order rejecting the prayer for recall of the Investigating Officer was set aside. The rule was made absolute and the application disposed of. The Officer was directed to remain present for further