The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, dismissing the main challenge in this criminal writ petition, granted a direction for the oral evidence to be led in the matter, allowing the trial to proceed expeditiously.
Image of oral evidence to be led in the matter and trial to proceed expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.178 OF 2006
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders.
of Coram, appearance, Court’s
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.S.N.Marwadi with J.J. Kanani and
S.P. Narkar for the Petitioner.
Mr.Vinay Rathod for the Respondent
No.2.
Mr.P.S.Hingorani, APP. for the State.
CORAM : R.S. MOHITE,J.
DATED : 02/02/2006.
P.C.
1. Mr. Vinay Rathod appears
voluntarily and states that he is
appearing for Respondent No.2. The
only point raised in this petition is
Section 145(2) of the Negotiable
Instruments Act. The Advocate for the
respondent No.2 states that he will put
his witness in the witness box and lead
oral evidence relating to examination
in chief. In the circumstances,
nothing survives in this petition.
:2:
Statement is accepted. Petition is
disposed of subject to direction that
the oral evidence will be lead in the
matter. Mr. Marwadi states that his
client will co.operate the court.
Trial to proceed expeditiously.
(R. S. MOHITE, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. S.N. Marwadi
Mr. Vinay Rathod
State
R. S. MOHITE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court