Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court allowed the withdrawal, vacated any interim relief, and disposed of the matter with no order as to costs. The accompanying notice of motion was declared infructuous.
Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn; interim relief vacated; disposal with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1127 OF 1998 WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 347 OF 1999
Biren Vallabhji Savla. ... Petitioner. V/s. The Union of India & other. ... Respondents.
P.S.Jetly for the petitioner.
None for the respondents.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 16th June 2006.
P.C. :
. On the motion made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, petitioner is allowed to withdraw
this petition. . Interim relief operating, if any, stands vacated. . Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with no order as to costs. . In view of disposal of writ petition, notice of motion taken out therein does not survive.
Motion is disposed of as infructuous with no order as
to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA J.)
Biren Vallabhji Savla
The Union of India
V.C.Daga
J.P.Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
