Indubai Umakant Hire and Ors. v. Bajirao Dada Dhomase and Ors.

... 1 ...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

SECOND APPEAL NO.772 OF 2003

OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS

COURT’S OR JUDGES

ORDERS

AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS

Shri Kishor Patil i/by Shri P.N. Joshi for the Appellants. Shri Ramesh Dube-Patil for the Respondent No.1a.

CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : JULY 25, 2006.

P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate appearing

for	the Appellants. The Appellants a	re the
original	defendants. The Trial Court	passed
a	decree for specific performance	against
the	Appellants. The decree for	specific
performance	has been confirmed in the	Appeal
by	the District Court. After having	heard
the	submissions of the Advocates	appearing
on t	he behalf of the parties, I find	that
there	are concurrent findings of	fact
recorded	by the courts below.	The
concurrent	findings of fact are based	on
appreciation	of oral and d	ocumentary
evidence	on record. No substantial	question