Disposed
Durgaprasad Bansilal Late v. Shriram Narayan Vaidya and Anr.
Bombay HCFA/43/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
FIRST APPEAL NO.43 OF 2006
.............................................................
Office Notes,Office
memorandum of Coram,
appearances,Court’sCourt’s or
orders or directionsJudge’s orders
& Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or
Judge’s orders
.............................................................
Mr.R.K.Saroj i/b Mr.S.V.Pitre for the
Appellant
Mr.Vaibhav Patankar i/b Mr.M.S.Lagu for
Respondent Nos.1 and 2
CORAM: A.S.OKA, J.
DATED: JULY 24, 2006.
P.C.:
1. Admit. Advocate for Respondent Nos.1
and 2 waives service.
2. Printing is dispensed with. The
Appellant is directed to file private
paper book along with sufficient number of
copies thereof within a period of one year
from today. If the paper book is not
filed within stipulated period, the Appeal
will stand dismissed for want of
prosecution without further reference to
the Court.
Judge.
Appellant
Respondent Nos.1
Respondent Nos.2
A.S. OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court