Subodh Balsaraf v. the Commissioner of Police and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
P.I.L. NO.144 OF 2006
Subodh Balsaraf
......Petitioner.
V/s
The Commissioner of Police Mumbai & Ors. Respondents.
Mr. S.A. Sawant with Mr. Himanshu Kode for the Petitioner.
Ms. Naveena Kumari for Union of India.
Mr. P.M. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for Respondent Nos. 1 to 8.
CORAM : H.S. BEDI, C.J., & V.M.KANADE, J.
DATE : DECEMBER, 7, 2006 P.C.
In view of the affidavit filed by Rajesh Raghunath Kasare, Sub Inspector, Cyber Crime Investigation Cell, Crime Branch, C.I.D. Mumbai dated 29/11/2006, Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous as the necessary relief has been granted to the Petitioner.
C HIEF JUSTICE
2
V.M. KANADE, J.
Subodh Balsaraf
Commissioner of Police Mumbai
Union of India
H.S. Bedi
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court