A notice of motion filed by an applicant seeking impleadment as a respondent in an existing writ petition was disposed of. The court allowed the impleadment as there was no objection from the petitioner.
Notice of motion disposed of; Applicant allowed to be impleaded as party Respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.457 OF 2006
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.632 OF 1994
Shri.Vinayaka Ice Creams (Pvt) Ltd.& Ors... Petitioners
V/s
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
And
Parashar Mehta .. Applicant
Mr.Milind Sathe with Mr.S.B.Kotak i/by M/s.Purnanand &
Co.for the Petitioners.
Mr.V.K.Shiralkar i/by M/s.Shiralkar & Co.for the
Applicant.
Mrs.Madhubala Kajale, AGP for State.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
DATE : 07th November, 2006.
P.C.:
1. Mentioned. Not on board. Heard the learned Counsel
for the parties. This Notice of Motion has been taken
out by the Applicant-Parashar Mehta to get himself
impleaded in the Petition as a party Respondent. The
learned Counsel for the Petitioner has no objection for
the same. In view thereof, Applicant is allowed to be
impleaded as party Respondent in the petition.
Amendment to be carried out within a period of one week
from today. Notice of motion stands disposed of
accordingly.
2. Place the Petition on board for final hearing on
28.11.2006.
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Shri. Vinayaka Ice Creams (Pvt) Ltd. & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Parashar Mehta
DR. S. Radhakrishnan
V. K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court