The High Court found the writ petition infructuous upon reviewing an affidavit filed by the respondent and discharged the rule, while reserving the right for petitioners to approach the Court again if grievances persist.
Rule stands discharged. Petitioners are entitled to approach the Court again if grievances remain.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2754 OF 1994
Baun Foundation Trust & Anr. ...Petitioners
Vs.
The Bombay Municipal Corporation & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Seervai, Senior Advocate i/b. M/s.Dhru & Co. for the Petitioners. Mr.V.Mahadik i/b.A.H.Chheda & Co. for the Respondent-B.M.C.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
DATE : 6TH NOVEMBER, 2006
P.C.
| 1. H |
eard the lear | ned Coun | sel for t | he Peti | tioners | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| and the |
learned | Cou | nsel | for | the | Resp | ondent- | |
| Corporation. | We | have | perus | ed | the | affidavit | dated | 8th |
| December,2005 | filed | by | the | Res | pondent | - | Corp | oration. |
| The present |
Petition | has | bec | ome | infruc | tuous. | In | view |
| thereof, Rule |
stands | disch | arged. | Howe | ver, it |
is | made |
clear that in the event the Petitioners have still any
grievance, they are entitled to approach this Court.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
:2:
Baun Foundation Trust & Anr.
The Bombay Municipal Corporation & Ors.
S Radhakrishnan
V K Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
