Raju Sanghrajka v. Harshad Sangrajka
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Bombay dismissed a Notice of Motion filed by the plaintiffs seeking attachment before judgment. The court held that the plaintiff failed to plead averments necessary to maintain the application under Order 38 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
What did the court decide?
Notice of Motion dismissed for failure to plead necessary averments under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC.