In a summary suit filed by plaintiffs against Life Insurance Corporation, the court dismissed the notice of motion because the plaintiffs and their advocates were absent from the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.170 OF 2006
IN
SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 333 OF 2005
IN
SUMMARY SUIT NO.177 OF 2005
Harish D. Gandhi....Plaintiffs.
vs.
Life Insurance Corporation....Defendants.
None for the plaintiffs in support.
Mr. Manoj Bhatia i/by.K.M.Bhatia
for the defendants.
CORAM: S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.
NOVEMBER 13, 2006.
P.C. :
1. Plaintiffs and their advocates absent. Hence,
Notice of Motion dismissed.
(S.J.VAZIFDAR, J)
S.J. VAZIFDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court